공갈등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of 3,00,000 won.
The defendant does not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
On October 25, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of robbery and the crime of interference with business at the Changwon District Court on January 4, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Changwon Prison on January 4, 2013, and on June 24, 2014, the Gwangju District Court sentenced one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., and the judgment was finalized on August 28, 201
"2014 Highest 2927"
1. Suppression;
A. On February 2, 2013, the Defendant, at the Eju shop operated by the victim C (V, 49 years of age) at the window of Changwon-si in the middle of the year 2013, she saw the victim C, such as her beer and her beer and her bee and her bee and her bee and her bee and her bee and her bee and her bee and her bee and her bee and her bee and her bee
The Defendant, as such, got the victim to attack, and let the frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter 3,00 won frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter.
B. Around April 2013, the Defendant, at the H main point operated by the Victim F (the age of 36) G located in the window G of Changwon-si, sent alcohol to customers by drinking alcohol, taking a brut impression, taking a brut impression, taking a brut on the floor of the beer, and releasing the beer residues on the floor.
As such, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the above amount by putting the victim to frighten, and putting the drinking value equivalent to the market value of 3,000 won from the drinking victim.
2. On June 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s bridge once on the ground that the victim J (V, 40 years of age) did not drink the alcohol at the K cafeteria operated by the first police officer of Changwon-si, Changwon-si.
3. Interference with business;
A. On December 19, 2013, from around 19:00 to around 19:30, the Defendant expressed a desire to “for the purpose of interfering with the business of the victim L, i.e., in the Nju station operated by the victim L, who is in the window M, for the reason that the victim does not drink with himself/herself, he/she does not drink with the victim.”