(a) Attached drawings among the real estate first floor in the attached list shall be indicated in (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6);

A. On March 8, 2012, the Plaintiff leased to C the above part of (A) on the first floor of the real estate listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant part”) among the real estate in the attached list to C by setting the lease deposit of KRW 50 million, monthly rent of KRW 5.1 million, and the lease term of KRW 5.1 million from March 30, 2012 to March 30, 2013, and C established the Defendant as its representative on April 24, 2012. On February 19, 2013, the Defendant drafted a “factory lease renewal contract” with the Plaintiff under the name of the Defendant, and uses the instant part (a) by going through the statutory renewal procedure until now.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant lease contract”) between the Plaintiff and the Defendant that was entered into by the Defendant upon succession C.

From May 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to raise the monthly rent of KRW 6 million (excluding value-added tax) as stipulated in the instant lease agreement. From May 2015 to January 2017, the Plaintiff issued an electronic tax invoice for KRW 6 million on the monthly rent of KRW 5 million.

C. From around 2014, the Defendant began to delay the monthly rent stipulated in the instant lease agreement. Even based on the Defendant’s assertion, the sum of the monthly rent in arrears exceeds KRW 46 million up to the present.

Accordingly, on January 13, 2017, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to pay the monthly rent that has been in arrears by content-certified mail, and sent to the Defendant a content-certified mail stating that “The instant lease contract is terminated on February 19, 2017 as well as the monthly rent has been in arrears for not less than six consecutive months, and the said content-certified mail reaches the Defendant on February 19, 2017.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 15 (including additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the lease contract that the Plaintiff entered into with the Defendant is terminated.