(a) Project name: 1) Project implementer for K Housing Redevelopment rearrangement project: Publication of project implementation authorization for Defendant 3: Publication of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City on May 22, 2014;

B. On January 29, 2016, the expropriation date of local Land Expropriation Decision 1: March 18, 2016: Each land on the parcel number column of the land to be expropriated in the attached Table owned by the plaintiffs in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as "each land in this case") and the compensation for its ground obstacles (the plaintiff only seeks an increase in compensation for each land in this case, and the plaintiff is omitted; hereinafter referred to as "in this case"), the compensation is 3): An appraisal corporation in the attached Form 4 as shown in each column of the amount of compensation for expropriation decision as a result of the appraisal of the attached Table: Sam Chang Chang Corporation and Sam Il appraisal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "appraisal for expropriation decision"): The result of the appraisal is referred to as "the result of the appraisal decision for expropriation".

C. Compensation for the Central Land Tribunal’s objection No. 1 on August 25, 2016: As a result of the appraisal, the Korea Appraisal Board and the Korea Appraisal Board and the Korea Appraisal Board and the Korea Appraisal Board and Appraisal Board (hereinafter “Appraisals and Appraisal Board”) for the appraisal: The results of the appraisal are “the results of the appraisal of an objection”; the appraisal of the acceptance ruling and the appraisal of the objection; and the appraisal of the acceptance ruling and the appraisal of the objection are referred to as “adjudications and appraisers”).

(d) Results of appraisal by appraiser M: The same as the entries in the column of the court appraisal amount in the annexed sheet of the results of the appraisal (hereinafter referred to as the "court appraiser", and the results of the appraisal "based on recognition") / [the grounds for recognition] of absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 7, Eul evidence No. 8, the results of the appraisal by the court, the whole purport of the pleadings;

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Since the plaintiffs' arguments made an excessive evaluation of the value of each land of this case and the defendant calculated the under-paid compensation, it is reasonable compensation to the plaintiffs according to the court appraisal result.