On November 13, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and two years of suspended execution for fraud in the Gwangju District Court's Netcheon Branch on November 13, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 21, 2015.

On July 20, 2015, the defendant, who became aware of by the introduction of the branch, was the husband of the victim C, who was killed by fire fighting officials, living a stable life with pension and compensation, introduced himself that he owns a large number of real estate, had the victim have a sense of self-defense, had the victim receive a sense of self-defense, and followed by the premise of re-employment.

1. On July 28, 2015, the Defendant, under the name of deposit, told the victim that “A deposit for the lease on a house with a thickness of 150 million won shall be borne by the Defendant at KRW 35 million.”

However, even if the defendant received KRW 35 million from the victim as the deposit for the lease on a deposit basis, he used only KRW 10 million as the monthly deposit, and the remaining money was thought to be used for personal purposes, so there was no intention or ability to seek the house of KRW 150 million as the deposit for the lease on a deposit basis.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the victim’s seat, i.e., KRW 4 million from the victim’s seat, and received KRW 5 million from the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number: E) managed by the Defendant, around July 31, 2015, KRW 10 million from August 1, 2015, KRW 10 million from August 13, 2015, and KRW 10.4 million from August 13, 2015, and received KRW 35.4 million in total on four occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On October 13, 2015, the Defendant said on October 13, 2015, that “The Defendant, under the pretext of the investment in an acting driving office, said that “the Defendant would have a good health, thereby making a stable investment in an acting driving company. The Defendant would pay money to the operating expenses of

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he thought that he will use it as a criminal agreement fee of the accused accused accused, so he will or she will have the ability to use it as operating expenses of the substitute driving office.