However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 29, 2014, at around 12:16, the Defendant: (a) purchased 1,200 Scam 1 disease from the victim C, which was operated by Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu; (b) and (c) promised to pay 1,000 won with money to the victim; and (d) decided that the victim would be able to do so; (b) the Defendant: (c) threatened the victim with “the victim to do so”; (d) caused the Defendant to avoid disturbance for about 20 minutes by gathering things in the display stand and walking the electric scam; and (e) prevented other customers in that place from purchasing goods.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's supermarket business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the confession of criminal conduct and the point agreed with the victim);

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;