beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.07.10 2013고단3008

위증교사

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 22, 2013, the Defendant lodged an appeal after having been sentenced to one year for violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. by the Incheon District Court on May 2, 2013.

around 15:00 on October 24, 2012, the Defendant, at the meeting room of the Seoul Southern-ro, Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, 865, performed an act of salving the Defendant’s hand below and below, as if the Defendant drinks the Defendant as a witness for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (mariana) and performed an act of salving the Defendant’s hand and good.

(c) shall not be effective.

This refers to "I ambling", and around 14:00 on November 8, 2012, E again from the same place as above, "Mara is present as a witness, and his testimony is important."

B. The fact that the Defendant stated, “I do not have any sphered test, and there is no single sphering test,” the Defendant had the hemp plant sphered and avoided it with E, but had the Defendant make a false testimony to the effect that “I sphere the hemp plant under the influence of alcohol and gather who is the person who received it at the same time.” Accordingly, E was present at the court of Incheon District Court No. 412, Jan. 14, 2013, which is located in the Nam-gu Incheon District Court No. 412, which is located in the Nam-gu Incheon District Court No. 412, to take an oath against the Defendant, and the prosecutor’s “I am sphere, even if spherfing it,

The term “equitable” means any question with the Prosecutor’s “s memory for a witness.”

The question " shall not be memoryed as to whether the question was "......."

“At the time of the public prosecutor’s “I wish to smoke with any of the Guns,” and is required to be known to that person as Defendant.

The testimony was made respectively to the question "".

Accordingly, the defendant had E make a false statement contrary to his memory in court, thereby instigating E with perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. An interrogation protocol of the accused and E by the prosecution;

1. A copy of or a transcript of the protocol of examination of witness;