폭행
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
At around 18:00 on April 15, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim E (18 years of age) at DPC toilets located in Seopopo City C on the ground that the victim E takes tobacco, on the ground that he takes tobacco, twice the victim’s left scam scam, once again, the victim’s left scam scam with a defect that intends to take the victim’s scam again, once again, and continued to turn the victim’s scam with a scam scam.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. E statements;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (grounds for not photographing the victim, etc.);
1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The fact that the defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, led to the confession of the crime of this case, the first offender who had no record of committing the crime prior to the crime of this case, and the defendant, who was hospitalized in the military as early as he was hospitalized, can be considered as favorable to the
However, the Defendant, while making a PC-bapt, assaulted the victim under the pretext of reporting and admonishing the victim and his female students to smoke in the toilet. The victim is a minor, and the degree of assault is difficult to deem that the victim is minor, and the victim was punished because the Defendant failed to use the above crime from the victim or to reach an agreement, it is difficult to deem that the victim was punished by the victim. The sentencing example in similar cases, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, the circumstances leading to the instant crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, shall be determined as ordered by the text.