A. The punishment sentenced by the court below to the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). In light of the records and arguments in this case, there is no change of circumstances that may consider the sentencing following the lower judgment, and considering the various sentencing conditions as seen in the records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or it does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, even when considering the circumstances asserted by the Defendant and the prosecutor as the grounds for appeal.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.