손해배상(산)
1. The judgment of the court of first instance, including the claim extended by the plaintiff succeeding intervenor in the trial, shall be modified as follows.
1. The court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Occurrence of and limitation on liability for damages;
A. The Defendant’s liability for damages, as an incidental duty under the good faith principle accompanying the labor contract, bears the duty to take necessary measures, such as improving the physical environment so that an employee does not harm life, body, and health in the course of providing his/her labor, and is liable for compensating for damages caused by his/her violation of such duty to protect employees.
(2) On February 23, 199, the court below ordered the Plaintiff to conduct the cleaning work of the instant machinery that was not within the original business area on the ground that there is a vacancy in the mechanical checkup, and had the Plaintiff continue to be in charge of the cleaning work even after the mechanical checkup manager was recruited; ② the Defendant entrusted the Plaintiff with the cleaning work of the instant machinery and notified the Plaintiff of safety regulations to be observed in the process of cleaning the instant machinery; and ② there is no objective evidence to deem that the Defendant, as reference material after the closure of the trial proceedings, concluded the accident management contract with the external company prior to the accident safety management contract with the Plaintiff, and submitted reference materials to the safety management company from time to time, including the safety management manager.