However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a cubing car from the Do in front of the new interesting elementary school, which was under the influence of alcohol 0.152% in the influence of alcohol during blood at around 00:30 on March 5, 2016; (b) from the Do in front of the new interesting elementary school, the Defendant driven a cub car at approximately KRW 80 meters in d.

2. The Defendant, even a criminal, was aware of the fact that he/she had a traffic accident under which he/she was parked while drinking alcohol at the temporary location under the above paragraph.

E (W. 40 years old) Telephones to E (W. Roymbly L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.W. L.W. L. L.W. L.W. Ha.W.)

There have been previous records of drinking driving, and if it is controlled at once, it is very difficult to do so, and E has accepted it by requesting several times, so that E was present at the gold belt of the net Police Station and has caused an accident that he/she is driving.

The statements were made and the statements accordingly were also made.

As a result, the defendant instigated a person who commits a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment to escape.

Summary of Evidence

The application of the law to notify the defendant of the legal statement E and F of the traffic accident report of each traffic accident related person to F, the situation report of the driver at the State, and the results of the crackdown on drinking driving.

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2 (driving of Drinking) and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 151 (1) and 31 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for an offense;

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which increases concurrent crimes;

3. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution;

4. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order has the history of having been punished twice due to drinking driving, and it is not good that the crime of aiding and abetting another person to commit an offense is also not good, even if the defendant has a motor vehicle accident resulting in driving a motor vehicle again.

However, the defendant made a confession at the police investigation stage, against the mistake.