사기
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant committed the crime of August 11, 2014, at the beauty art room operated by the victim D, which was located in Chuncheon-si, Chuncheon-si, on August 11, 2014, extended the amount to be paid in Seoul, if the Defendant leased KRW 15 million to the victim “I want to change his husband’s personal taxi for a long time.”
Inn and there are private taxies, Doz. Doz. Doz.
“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, the Defendant and her husband E had a debt of approximately KRW 240 million to the Cartol New Cooperative, KRW 60 million to F, KRW 40 million to G, and KRW 100 million to H. The Defendant and E had an auction from July 11, 2014 for the land and buildings of the International Telecom jointly operated by the Defendant and E., and it is difficult to pay interest of KRW 3 million per month only on the operating income of the said International Telecom and the taxi operation income of the said E, and there was no intention or ability to change it on the agreed date even if it was borrowed from the damaged person due to the lack of any other property or income.
The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, was transferred KRW 15 million from the victim to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant around August 11, 2014.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
2. On September 4, 2014, the Defendant committed a crime on September 4, 2014, concluded a false statement to the effect that “If the remainder for purchasing a taxi is extended to KRW 15 million, it shall be repaid within 1-2 months,” with the victim D.
However, the Defendant was planning to repay the obligation to the KITol S, etc. with the borrowed money, and even if the Defendant borrowed the money from the injured party, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to change the money on the agreed date.
The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, was transferred KRW 14.6 million to the said new bank account around September 4, 2014 from the victim.
This is the defendant.