beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2016.04.22 2016고단174

폭행

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On January 3, 2016, the Defendant, within the main point of “C” located in Jinju-si B and 2, Jinju-si on January 3, 2016, instructed the victim D (the victim 58 years of age) to report to the police within the main point of “C” located in Jinju-si B and 2, and requested the victim to report to the police, but did not know of the report.

In the head, gasoline shall be fluorged and discarded.

“Along with the victim’s left side, the victim was blicked one time with the victim’s hand, and the victim was blicked with the victim’s hand, and the victim was blicked in the beer’s head and blicker inside the beer and blicker’s head and blicker.

2. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it is recognized that the victim D expressed his/her intent not to prosecute the defendant on March 21, 2016, after the public prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.