When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On December 16, 2015, from around December 16, 2015 to December 17, 2015, the Defendant drafted D’s signature in the letter of delegation using the official approval color pen, and drafted a letter of delegation in the name of E and F, by inserting F’s signature in the letter of delegation.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of delegation of wages in the name of E/F, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On December 17, 2015, the Defendant exercised the instant investigation document at the H construction site located in Ansan-si and used the forged wage as if it were a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witness D's testimony;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect against each part of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to I and E;

1. A certificate;

1. Investigative reports (attached to e-mail closure screens, etc.) and accompanying materials;

1. A criminal investigation report (in cases of attaching the original copy, such as power of attorney for reference D submitted wages) and accompanying materials;

1. An investigation report (F telephone statement hearing report) [the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., I sent to the Defendant on December 14, 2015, a letter of delegation for receipt of personnel expenses (the 142 pages of investigation records) and a certificate of his/her personal seal impression, etc. by a person who works at the above construction site by e-mail from the Defendant. However, the J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “J”) has paid the above part’s wages to the Defendant on the letter of delegation (the 200th page of investigation records; hereinafter referred to as the “the letter of delegation for the instant wages”) written by the person who works at the above construction site as the Defendant, and the Defendant has paid the above part’s wages to the Defendant, and the Defendant has arbitrarily used the above part’s wages to the Defendant or the above parts without saying the fact that he/she received the above part’s wages from J.