However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

On December 15, 2015, at around 16:30, the Defendant: (a) administered a single-use medication containing approximately 0.03g of mert amba (one philopon) which was delivered from B (54) in a mutual influorial toilet located in the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Mapo-si, a Mapo-si, by means of inserting water into a single-use medication, which is a local mental medicine drug, and melting the melter into the Mapo-si incam.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect B; and

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of investigation reports (referring to the results of inspection of minor reagents), investigation reports (referring to photographs of a host country), written expert opinions, and replys to requests for expert opinions;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Selection and Management of Narcotics, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense (the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Protective observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the proviso to Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. for Additional Collection;

1. Scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing guidelines: Imprisonment with prison labor for up to two years (the scope of the recommended punishment), medication, simple possession, etc. (up to 10 months to 2 years) in the basic area (up to 10 years) (up to 2 years);

2. Determination of sentence: The sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and result of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission.

Since narcotics crimes are seriously adverse to society by directly infringing on national health and causing various crimes, there is a high need for public interest to eradicate them.

Even though there was a history of punishment for the same crime, the crime of this case has been committed.

The favorable circumstances: The crime of this case is recognized and reflected.

From 199, the narcotics have not been administered until before the crime of this case was committed.