However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 9, 2019, the Defendant, at around 10:50 on May 9, 2019, driven a fenz car without a car driver’s license from around 2km to the front road located in Suwon-si B, Suwon-si, which was located in the same Gu, from around 10:50 to the front road located in the same Gu.

2. On May 15, 2019, the Defendant, at around 23:55 on May 15, 2019, driven a bents car without a car driver’s license from the front road in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Seoul to approximately 5km from May 15, 2019 to the front road in the same Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. 긱 무면허운전정황보고

1. Application of the statutes on the register of driver's licenses;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and the Selection of Punishment, and Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Order of Education and the Order of Community Service was that the defendant had a license revoked due to drunk driving and has not been long enough, and the nature of the crime was not good, and that he was not involved in the trial without permission despite being aware that the trial of this case is in the continuation of the trial of this case, etc. are disadvantageous to the defendant. Meanwhile, the fact that the defendant acknowledged the crime, the fact that the defendant is a mere unauthorized driving case, and the fact that there was no criminal record exceeding the fine, etc. are considered favorable to the defendant, and all of the sentencing conditions stated in the records of this case are considered favorable to the