The sentence of the court below (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is acknowledged that the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of each of the crimes of this case, and agreed with the victim of the crime of interference with business of this case, etc. However, considering all of the factors of the crime of this case and the method of the crime of interference with business of this case, the crime is committed during the period of repeated crime due to the same obstruction of the performance of official duties and the crime of interference with business, the past has been punished several times, and all of the sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, criminal records, circumstances after the crime, the risk of recidivism, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.