정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, who does not have a certain occupation, operates a black channel next to the Internet site in the account of “C”.
On October 3, 2012, the prosecutor of the instant trial changed the facts charged as to “false defamation” through the amendment to the indictment into the facts charged, and did not delete or alter the part of “the facts are “whether the content of education in the course of operation of the victim’s association E does not cite or induce North Korea to do so.” In light of the overall purport of the amendment to the indictment, this appears to be an omission of simple changes in the indictment, and there is no disadvantage to the defendant’s exercise of his right to defense, and thus, the prosecutor deleted the relevant part.
As the title “D” on the Defendant’s Blobb, the part of “F” operated by the Victim E, as in Section 1 of the above note, is deleted, and there is no disadvantage to the Defendant’s exercise of the right of defense, and the part of “F,” necessary for maintaining the overall context of the facts charged, is added to “F, operated by the Victim E,” which is necessary for maintaining the entire context of the facts charged.
Of the teachers of G alternative schools, the espionage calendars are flicking, and it is likely to be flicked as soon as it is the field of education.
The phrase “(s)” was registered.
Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the honor of the victim by openly exposing facts through the Internet block, which is an information and communications network for the purpose of slandering the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Statement made by the police with H;
1. Application of laws and subordinate statutes, including the notice of "D" attached to the defendant and the notice of "D" by the Seoul Central District Court 2012, Gohap 54191, as well as the notice of the decision substituting conciliation
1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;