beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.19 2017가단36305

소유권확인

Text

1. The Defendant confirms that the share of 1/3 of the 19,636 square meters out of the wife population I forest 19,636 square meters is owned by the Plaintiffs.

2...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The circumstances and status of real estate (1) and two other parties, i.e., the Plaintiff’s fleet J (J, after the fact that it was called “K,” and became “L”; hereinafter referred to as “L”) were determined by the Gyeonggi-do KI forest and fields.

Accordingly, "JJ et al." was written as the owner of the land cadastre in the Gu land cadastre of the Gando-gun I forest in Gyeonggi-do.

(2) According to the registration of the change of administrative jurisdiction and the conversion of the area, I forest land in the Gyeonggi-do is registered in the forest land register as 19,636 square meters of land (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

An owner of the real estate of this case is not indicated in the forest land register but only indicated as “land to be restored by the landowner under Article 74 of the Act on Land Survey, Waterway Survey and Cadastral Records”.

(3) The instant real estate is currently unregistered.

B. The inheritance relationship following L’s death (1) L had several other children other than NA (hereinafter “O”) between wife M and wife, and died on October 9, 1945.

(2) Following the death of LA, the head of South-North O succeeded to the property as a family heir.

O had P, F, G, and H as his child between Plaintiff A and his wife, and died on October 4, 197.

(3) As a result of the death of theO, P and Plaintiff F, G, and H, who is the spouse, became co-inheritors.

(4) P had Plaintiff C, D, and E as his child between Plaintiff B, the wife, and died on August 25, 2013.

Accordingly, the plaintiff C, D, and E, who is the spouse of P, jointly inherited the P's property.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including each number in the case of additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, L acquired the ownership of 1/3 shares out of the instant real estate by jointly taking into account the instant real estate with two other persons, and the Plaintiffs order the said shares from L.