성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.
The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B is a business owner who operates a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of "D" in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Officetel, and the defendant A is an employee in charge of customer management and management through the Internet advertising site at the above business establishment.
From early September 2013 to July 9, 2014, the Defendants: (a) leased five rooms of the said officetel 706, 1213, 1301, 1501, and 2010; (b) induced customers by advertising the said business in the Internet amusement information site; and (c) employ F, G, etc. as women in sexual traffic on the condition that 80,000 won or 160,000 won shall be paid for each customer, among 130,000 won or 2.50,000 won which the Defendants received in preparation for per customer; (b) had the said F receive in return for money from customers who are not registered in the name of customers in the said office around 16:30 on July 16, 2014; and (c) had the said women find commercial sex acts and receive the consideration for such commercial sex acts against male customers.
Accordingly, the Defendants engaged in commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ legal statement
1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect with respect to F or G;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (the defendants);
1. (Defendant A) Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (Defendant B);
1. In light of all the circumstances such as the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the size of business and operating period, the degree of the Defendants’ participation, the age, character and conduct of the Defendants, criminal records, criminal records, family relations, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence as ordered shall be imposed.