상해
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not err by misapprehending the facts charged, and thereby convicted the Defendant of the instant facts charged, even though the Defendant did not have inflicted an injury by assault, such as making the F’s timber, flaps, and flaps, etc.
2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the victim F was at the investigative agency and court of the court below where the victim had a high speech while the defendant talked about the company's business, and became at the victim's seat. The defendant was pushed down the victim's boom, boomed the boom, and pushed down the victim's will. At the same time, the defendant did not look back to the defendant's secret and power, and was issued a diagnosis again at the hospital. The defendant did not come back to the emergency room at the next night, and the defendant did not come back to the hospital again, and was issued with a diagnosis after being given treatment. The defendant made a concrete and consistent statement as to the situation at the time of the victim's booming water, and then, he was found to have been aware of the victim's credibility and credibility in his testimony at the investigative agency and the defendant's oral statement at the court below.
At the time, the victim's smuggling from the defendant was examined.
At the time of the instant case, the victim was in line with the employee at the meeting room, and was assaulted.