대통령긴급조치제9호위반
The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.
1. From October 1975, the Defendant and the applicant for a retrial (hereinafter “Defendant”) conspired to hold an assembly or demonstration against the current Constitution, the Government, and Emergency Decree No. 9 at the time from around October 1975, along with C, D, E, F, etc. The Defendant agreed to the following: (a) on November 14, 1975, F proposed that the Defendant be accompanied by the mother of the students of G University at the multilateral office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and (b) that F would lead the students of G University; (c)
A. On November 14, 1975, the Defendant, at F’s guidance, exchanged the opinion of H University C in the multilateral room located in the front of the H University, exchanged the opinion of C, and received one sheet of printed material to be used in the back from him. On November 16, 1975, the Defendant reviewed C and F in the multilateral room located in Seoul Cheongyang-gu, Seoul, and then reported the production of printed material to F. On November 17, 1975, and confirmed the date and time of the production of printed material from the multilateral room located in Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, to F.
B. From October 21, 1975, C, D, I et al. issued articles and cash necessary for the above student’s appearance, printed and produced printed materials, delivered printed and printed printed materials to each other, delivered printed materials to school students with such printed materials possessed in the future, and distributed them to H University students. On November 18, 1975, C, D, et al. requested the participation of the students in the front of the H University Department, which was scheduled to be held on November 11, 1975, and the preparation for an assembly or demonstration for an assembly or demonstration requesting the resignation of the head of H University, rather than ordinary nonpolitical activities.
2. Case progress
A. On February 28, 1976, the Defendant’s violation of the Presidential Emergency Measures against the Republic of Korea, etc. on the part of the Seoul District Court, 75 Gohap444, 76 Gohap16 (Consolidated), etc., (hereinafter “Emergency Measures No. 9”) 7 and 1 on February 28, 1976
(b)bed;
Based on the provision, one year of imprisonment (However, the execution of imprisonment was suspended for three years) and one year of suspension of qualification (hereinafter “instant judgment subject to a retrial”) were sentenced, and this is so.