However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CM5 vehicle volume.

1. On August 5, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Ething Vehicles) and the Act on the Traffic of Roads (unclaimed Measures after Accidents) led the Defendant to drive the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.193% at around 22:00, while driving the said vehicle, and proceeding at a speed of about 30km per hour at the speed of 5:00,000, the front of the E hospital located in Donsan-gu D at the front city of the front city, along the shooting distance of the front city telephone station located in the front city of the front city.

Since there is no signal signal, there was a duty of care to check whether there is another vehicle passing through the intersection by reducing the speed of the vehicle to a person engaged in driving the vehicle, and to check whether there is another vehicle passing through the intersection by checking well the right and the right and the right of the vehicle, and to prevent the accident in advance by driving the vehicle safely

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, and neglected to do so, caused the part of the back end part of the passenger vehicle of the Defendant, which is driven by the victim F (28 3 years old) in front of the Defendant in the same direction as the Defendant, to the front end part of the Defendant’s vehicle. The Defendant continued to drive the back part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the instant passenger vehicle in front of the left end of the I SP vehicle operated by the victim H (3 years old) who is in front of the Defendant’s opposite direction while the Defendant continued to drive beyond the central line, and followed the part of the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the I SP vehicle in front of the left end part and the J F F FF vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the K K restaurant in the same direction, and followed with the rear part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the course of performing the above duties on G Skystar Co., Ltd. owned by the Victim N, with the repair cost of KRW 451,828, the repair cost of the 413,718, and the J reputation Co., Ltd. owned by the Victim P for the I Skystar Co., Ltd.