beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2015.04.22 2014고단1242

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around October 2005, the Defendant used the D’s resident registration certificate that was living together because of the absence of particular income or assets, and received the D’s resident registration certificate under D’s name, and used it for living expenses. On the settlement date of the credit card, the Defendant was willing to use D’s credit card by means of return from other credit cards or lending money. On November 1, 2005, the Defendant used D’s resident registration certificate that was kept in S’s book at the home of the first floor E in Jinjin-si, Seoul and submitted to the credit card company an application for the issuance of the D’s credit card under its name, and was issued with D’s card, LD card, non-C card, Samsung Card, foreign exchange card, and national bank card from the credit card company.

1. On November 10, 2005, the Defendant was provided cash services of KRW 1,00,000,000, using a slot card issued by stealing his/her name by stealing his/her address in the cash withdrawal machine of the Japanese bank branch and the office of the Japanese branch and the office of the Japanese branch. From then on March 25, 2008, the Defendant was provided cash services of KRW 51,558,100 in total on 126 occasions from the automatic withdrawal machine using a credit card issued by stealing his/her name, such as the “cash” in the annexed list of crimes, until March 25, 2008.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the property of the manager of the automatic cash withdrawal machine.

2. On November 10, 2005, the Defendant habitually committed an illegal use of the name, such as “date”, “value”, and “date and time” as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, from May 2, 2008, by deceiving the person under whose name the said store was managed by using the credit card in the name of the Defendant, as if he were to properly settle the accounts by using the credit card in the name of the Defendant.