마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
A penalty of KRW 100,000 shall be collected from a defendant.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On May 23, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to four months by imprisonment with prison labor for a crime under the Narcotics Control Act at the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong Housing Site Board and completed the execution of the sentence on July 11, 2013 at the Suwon Housing Center.
【Criminal Facts】
1. The Defendant is not a person handling narcotics, etc., in violation of the Narcotics Control Act.
Nevertheless, around 02:00 on May 17, 2014, the Defendant injected approximately 0.05 g of psychotropic drugs by dilution them into the water at the hospital room of 181, Seoul Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Seoul Seongbuk-gu, 181, “Seoul Seongbuk-gu Hospital”, and then administering them by dilutioning them into the water.
2. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (such as damage to property, such as collective weapons, etc.) is missing from a sense that Chinese people, which only inflict damage on the Republic of Korea due to the influence of the administration of philophones, are hiding in a building.
A. On May 17, 2014, around 08:30, at the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment Building (Bdong) rooftop, one-person dust (1.50 cm in length), which is a dangerous object in the vicinity of the rooftop, shall be accompanied by an entrance door of a transformation room equivalent to 1.4 million won in the market price managed by the victim D, and shall be accompanied by the inspection equipment and the window of the elevator machine room.
B. On the fiveth floor of the commercial building in the same temporary border, the victim E, who was in danger of the “Fridge” managed by the victim E, destroyed and damaged the 4-line winding machine with a size of 1820,000 won in the market value, 6-year winding machine, 6-year sexual bags bags, etc.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. The defendant No. 2-B of the first interrogation protocol against the defendant.
Although the defendant denies the part of the facts constituting the crime of this paragraph, the defendant added a simple warehouse entrance at the time of the first interrogation of the suspect, and added a simple warehouse entrance at the Fluxe Council, attached a lux with a lux, etc., and added a lux with a lux with a luxial mind.