대여금
1. The plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange in the trial is dismissed.
2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
First of all the determination on the cause of the claim, the plaintiff was proposed to operate the above third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third third
9. The Defendant paid KRW 15,00,000 to the Defendant as investment, and paid half of the monthly profits to the Defendant and E from that time. Since the Defendant closed the above Deputy Director on June 20, 2014 and the business partnership contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant was terminated, the Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff is liable to return KRW 15,000,000 to the Plaintiff.
Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the statement No. 1 and No. 1 of this case, the following facts are acknowledged: (a) on April 8, 2013, the Plaintiff closed his/her business under the name of the Defendant; (b) on June 20, 2014, the Plaintiff received a proposal for the operation of the above Deputy Director; (c) on August 9, 2013, the Plaintiff transferred KRW 15,00,000 to the head of the foreign exchange bank (F) in the name of the Defendant on August 9, 2013; (d) even if it is recognized that E received comprehensive delegation from the Defendant with respect to the operation of the Deputy Director, and around August 2013, the Plaintiff did not have any evidence to support the Plaintiff’s wife; and (e) on the ground that the Plaintiff did not have any evidence to support the operation of the Deputy Director, etc., the Plaintiff’s allegation that the Plaintiff entered the above No. 3 (Attachment No. 5) in the name of the Plaintiff.