손해배상(기)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following order shall be revoked.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff A awarded a contract to the Defendant, who is the Dongdong-gun, for the construction of the F Ground Housing at the above construction site, and the Defendant was placed in the dog that had been raised for several years at the Defendant’s residence (hereinafter “the instant dog”).
B. On May 21, 2014, Plaintiff A visited the construction site, and booked the back of the construction site along with the Defendant. At the time, at the time, the Defendant took the instant dog and taken the book.
Plaintiff
While A and the Defendant take rest at the mountain chin, the Plaintiff’s defect that the Plaintiff sought to wait to the opening of the instant case, and the opening of the instant case was the right arms of the Plaintiff itself.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.
Plaintiff
A owing to the instant accident, A suffered injury that requires 8 weeks’ medical treatment, such as damage to the fright edge and power lines, heat, etc. on the right side of the lower part.
At the time of the instant accident, the Defendant had not previously laid down the instant dog before the instant accident, and the Plaintiff A was also aware of it.
In addition, the opening of the instant case was hostile to the Defendant prior to the instant accident, and the Plaintiff A was aware of the said fact prior to the instant accident.
【Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1-1-2, Gap evidence 2-2 and the purport of the whole pleadings】
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. According to the above facts, the defendant is the possessor of an animal under Article 759 of the Civil Act, and is responsible for compensating the plaintiffs for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case. (2) The defendant donated or sold the instant dog to the plaintiff before the occurrence of the accident of this case. Thus, the defendant is not the owner or possessor of this case at the time of the accident of this case, and (2) the plaintiff A was bound to write down the instant dog, and the plaintiff A was bound to write down the instant dog at the time of the accident of this case.