When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 24, 2013, the Defendant recommended the Defendant to pay the drinking value, when the slope belonging to the D District E, which was dispatched after receiving a report from the “C Garan” in Jeju Island, which was located in B on November 24, 2013, due to the drinking value.

I would like to see the racker flap d. C.

Malibal aus shall not be installed.

"In doing so, the police officer E was able to see the breath of breath with her hand and see the face of drinking, thereby hindering the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning investigation and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, background, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, the records, such as circumstances after the commission of the crime, and the criminal records of the Defendant (a majority of the criminal records such as violence and injury, and criminal records such as obstruction of the performance of official duties), and the sentencing cases in the same similar case, the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order is not acknowledged to be excessive, and there is no change of circumstances that may be considered in sentencing after the summary order, and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition by maintaining the amount of fine for the summary