For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court acquitted the Defendant on the following grounds: (a) on the ground that there was no proof of a crime regarding the participation in “2010 No. 6. 15. 15. 10,” and each act of violation of the National Security Act (e.g., praise, etc.) arising from the acquisition and possession of pro-enemy materials in the instant facts charged; and

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of a crime of praiseing

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.