A. On January 31, 1996, the Plaintiff is married with C on January 31, 1996, and two children (the birth of 1996 and the birth of 199) between C and C.

B. From around 2016, the Defendant came to know of C, who was going to run a campaign at the “D” club. From May 2016, the Defendant maintained the relationship with C by exchanging C with other words such as “D” and having frequent contact with C from May 2016 (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2016Do320, Apr. 1, 2016).

C. Around August 2017, the Defendant moved his/her residence to Jeju-do, and worked in the Incorporated Agricultural Company E from September 1, 2017 to July 31, 2018, and C continues to reach an agreement between the Defendant and the Defendant on August 25, 2018, from October 20 to July 21, 2017, from December 23, 2017, from December 23, 2017 to December 25, 2017, from August 9, 2018 to September 11, 208, from September 14, 2018 to September 15, 2018.

Meanwhile, from April 2018, C paid only half the amount of living expenses previously paid to the Plaintiff from around June 2018. On the other hand, C demanded a divorce from June 2018, and on the other hand, C paid KRW 5 million to the Defendant on June 25, 2018 and KRW 20 million on August 14, 2018.

Although the Defendant stated that the said money was invested by C from the said money received from C, it is insufficient to recognize that only the evidence submitted by the Defendant was an investment amount, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

E. C around September 25, 2018, the contact with the Plaintiff was interrupted, and at present, a divorce suit is pending against the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 9, 11, 13, 14-2, Eul evidence 4 (including additional numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

(a) Even if a third party is a couple of the other party, it shall be a common life.