beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.08.18 2017고단1027

특수상해

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 16, 2017, the Defendant returned home of the Defendant, which was located in Jeju City D on March 23:30, 2017, to the victim E (36 years) who is the husband of the Defendant, and returned home with drinking without speaking in advance to the victim E (36 years) who was the husband of the Defendant, led the victim to the victim's face while the Defendant was in dispute, and the Defendant got about 14 days of medical treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement to E, and damaged photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical treatment certificate and a medical certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Six months of the suspended sentence;

1. In light of the fact that the sentencing of Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act exceeds the victim’s face due to the reason for sentencing, the crime committed in this case is highly bad.

However, there was an agreement between the defendant and his spouse on the date and time of criminal facts, the place where the failure was actually committed for a considerable period of time due to infertility between the victim and the victim, and the victim did not want criminal punishment against the defendant, and the victim submitted a written statement containing a written agreement between the victim and the victim that the victim would not be subject to criminal punishment against the defendant. The victim submitted a written statement seeking a prior action to this court, without any criminal history, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined by taking into account the various sentencing conditions stated in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment