사문서위조등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
1. The crime committed on May 21, 2014;
A. On May 21, 2014, the Defendant forged private document: (a) at “C” located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the mother of the Defendant, opened a mobile phone under the name of the Defendant’s mother; and (b) had two mobile phones enter the personal information of “B” on the solar PC screen presented by E, an employee of the said agency; (c) written the personal information of “D” in the form of “B”; (d) written directly in the applicant column as “D”; (d) written in the applicant column, written in the name of the D at will; and (d) written in “Personal Information Utilization Consent”; (e) written in “application for subscription to the LETpl Program”; and (e) written in “application for the registration of the loss of mobile phone” column in two pages of each applicant column; and (e) written voluntarily written in the name of D, “D” column.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising rights and obligations, the Defendant forged Chapter D’s “application for the purchase of personal information”, Chapter D’s “application for the purchase of personal information”, Chapter 2 “LETP program”, and Chapter 2 “application for the purchase of personal information loss insurance.”
B. As seen above, the Defendant held each of the above forged “application for the purchase of mobile phones”, “personal information utilization consent”, “application for the purchase of LTE Plus Program”, and “application for the purchase of insurance for loss of mobile phones” as a document duly formed, the Defendant held the aforementioned agency employees E, who knew of the forgery, using two new mobile phones.
2. The crime committed on May 23, 2014;
A. On May 23, 2014, in order to open a mobile phone under the name of the Defendant’s mother, at the place indicated in paragraph (1) around May 23, 2014, the Defendant, at the location indicated in paragraph (1), made the Defendant enter DNA’s personal information in the “written application for cellphone subscription” format using a string-top PC screen presented by E, an employee of the said agency, and directly stated “D” in the applicant column.