The defendant and the victim C(46 years) are in a fraudulent relationship between the defendant and the defendant, and there has been disputes over monetary issues between the victim and the defendant.

Around November 2, 2015, the Defendant did not say that he did not offer money to the injured party, or that he did not offer money to the injured party, when he did so with the injured party in the Defendant’s residence located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

“I hear the horses and b. I am b. I am b. I am b. I am b. I am b.

Omission Doz. Doz. Doz.

“In addition, they assaulted the victim by hand at several times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. A fine not exceeding 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (as the defendant is divided in depth into his own mistake, he will not commit such a crime in the future.

Considering that there is no criminal record against the defendant, such as the motive and circumstance of the case, and the fact that there is no criminal record against the defendant