교원소청심사위원회결정취소
1. On July 5, 2017, the Defendant’s case of review of revocation of the request for dismissal under 2017-353 between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant.
1. Details of the petition review and decision;
A. The Plaintiff is a school foundation that establishes and operates the C University (hereinafter “instant University”), and the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) is a person newly appointed as a professor for tourism management of the instant university and concurrent office on March 1, 2013, and is promoted to the former professor on September 3, 2014.
B. On July 14, 2014, the instant university entered into an agreement with the Korea Research Foundation and specialized junior college promotion projects, and the Intervenor was in charge of the actual operation of the D-based field learning and occupational learning program promoted as part of the said project.
C. On August 27, 2015, the Plaintiff’s president demanded a resolution on disciplinary action against the Intervenor on grounds of disciplinary reasons, such as ① inappropriate operation of a D-based on-site learning and job learning program by the Intervenor, ② excessive payment of the expenses incurred by the Intervenor, ③ the amount of National Treasury subsidies in 2015 is reduced, ③ the amount of industry-academic cooperation relationship with the industry, and ④ false entry of the period of the career of the industry at the time of submission of documents for employment support by the Intervenor, etc.
Plaintiff
On November 24, 2015, the teachers’ disciplinary committee decided to dismiss the Intervenor on the ground of the grounds for disciplinary action as follows.
1. Although the period of time when a false statement in the appointment documents was made in hotel E (from October 27, 2001 to May 18, 2004) was two years and seven months, a false statement was made that the curriculum of the submitted curriculum would interfere with the fair appointment process by stating that the career was extended by 12 months to 3 years and seven months.
2. As a professor of the principal school, the pertinent intervenor as a professor of the principal school was in charge of operating “D-based on-site learning programs” and “D-work learning programs”, a specialized junior college promotion project, as a professor of the principal school of this case, and operated each of the above programs on a voluntary basis without regard to professors in the department.