However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant and B (the age of 50) are married with a couple, and the victim C(the age of 67) and B had been sexually related with the victim C(the age of 67) and B from about 15 years to about 15 years, and the victim had recently been bullyingd by assaulting B in order to cut the south of himself.

At around 22:50 on June 12, 2019, the Defendant discovered that the victim scoods acoods car from the front parking lot of the Busan Northerndong, and the victim scoods B as above, scoods and scoods and scoods, which are dangerous objects to chemicalized B, and scoods and scoods following the above car, and scoods and scoods caused the victim scoods by opening the door of the driver’s seat and scoods and scoods.

As a result, the defendant carried a dangerous softener's disease, which is a dangerous thing, put the victim's unexploit face and chin ( approximately 3 cm in length, approximately 1.5 - 2 cm in depth) on the chin.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C;

1. Statement of each police statement related to B and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports (including photographs of the scene of occurrence and photographs attached thereto), investigation reports (the degree of injury of the victim C), investigation reports (the details of the direction of the inspection), investigation reports (including photographs attached thereto), investigation reports (including photographs attached thereto);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. In light of the purpose and method of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, and the part and degree of the injured party’s injury, the Defendant’s liability for the crime of this case is not somewhat weak.

However, it is certain that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, the defendant sought the wife of the defendant by mutual consent with the victim, and the victim committed a long-term illegal act with his spouse.