When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

around November 28, 2014, the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”) in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 305 (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”), and the same year, where the Defendant occupied C under the name of lease.

8. As of 28.2, an enforcement officer affiliated with the Seoul Western District Court removed a notice of provisional injunction against the transfer of real estate (the above court No. 2014Kadan4559) executed by the enforcement officer of the Seoul Western District Court on the instant real estate as delegated by E, a creditor, on the wall of the entrance entrance of the present site of the instant real estate, by attaching it to C, and was transferred from C the possession of the instant real estate against the order of provisional injunction

Accordingly, the defendant has harmed the utility of the indication of the compulsory disposition that the public official performed in relation to his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect C:

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Written decision (2014Kadan4559);

1. Application of published statutes;

1. Relevant Article 140 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;