However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 17, 2016, at around 01:14, the Defendant: (a) taken a 155 dongdongdongdongdongdong, in front of the 155 dongdongdongdongdongdong Station, and did not have any intent or ability to pay a taxi fee to D, a victim; (b) provided that “I am able to pay a taxi fee,” and that I am able to believe that I would pay a taxi fee; and (c) provided that “I am able to pay a taxi fee,” and that I am at the above Emna, but the door is closed, “I am 7 complex, SI am SI am SI am SI am SI am SI am SI am SI am SI am SI am SI am SI am SI am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement made by the police on D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on entry of receipts;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code contain the reasons for the fraud of the punishment and the recovery of damage, but the defendant repeats the same crime and has a criminal record of 26 times including the same criminal record of the same kind of crime.

In addition, the sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.