When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No order for recovery of a mountainous district, the form and quality of which have been changed by a competent authority, shall be violated.

The defendant from June 25, 2014 to the same year.

7. There was a fact that the Jeju District Court was sentenced to a fine by the Jeju District Court on the fact that a mountainous district was diverted with respect to a total forest of 1,66m2, such as Jeju City C, by October.

On October 17, 2014, the Defendant received an order to restore the site prior to the illegal mountainous district to its original state by submitting an application for approval of the plan for restoration within 30 days from the date of receipt of the restoration order with respect to the total of 1,669 square meters of the forest land indicated in the annexed list of crimes, from the Jeju Mayor. On May 20, 2016, the Defendant failed to comply with the restoration order even if he was urged to implement the restoration of the original state around the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the assistant judicial police officer with respect to D;

1. Forest damaged area map;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to partial certificates of registered matters (including oral matters);

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Articles 55 subparagraph 10, 44 (1) 2, and 37 (1) 1 of the Management of the Mountainous Districts subject to the option of punishment (the amount shall be determined in consideration of the size of the mountainous district, etc. within which the defendant has failed to perform the same kind of electricity, restoration order, or restoration order);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.