직업안정법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two million won of fine) is too unreasonable.
2. Although the defendant is a person with a disability in the third degree of brain disease, the defendant was punished for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act on November 5, 2013, the defendant continued to commit the crime of this case during the period of the suspension of execution, even though he was punished for a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a deadly weapon, etc.), there is no change in special circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below, and other various sentencing conditions in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstance of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct, are too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.