If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

No financial loan shall be made by pretending to sell goods or provide services, etc. by making a transaction by credit cards.

The Defendant, in collusion with B, agreed to pay 2% of the profits therefrom to the credit card holders who need financing by means of a credit card terminal, such as “C corporation,” etc., and return 90% of the settlement amount in cash.

On October 20, 2014, the Defendant received a request for financing from D in Seoul, pretended to sell goods, made a false settlement as if he purchased KRW 1.2 million with D’s E card using a credit card terminal in the name of “C Co., Ltd.”, made a false sales slip, and paid KRW 1.88,000,000,000 after deducting the fee per 10% of the settlement amount from D.

In addition, from around that time to October 1, 2015, the Defendant extended a total of KRW 1,383,076,000 over 823 times, such as the written list of crimes in the attached Form.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against F or D;

1. Copies of each business registration certificate;

1. A certificate for all registered matters;

1. G bank account (CH Co., Ltd.);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes attached to the judgment of accomplice who is an operator of a credit card tin company;

1. Relevant legal provisions and each of the former Financial Business Specializing in Credit (Amended by Act No. 13068, Jan. 20, 2015); Article 70(2)2 (a) of the Criminal Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act (Act No. 13068, Jul. 20, 2015); Article 70(3)2 (a) of the Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business; Article 30(3) of the Criminal Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act (Act No. 1306, Jul. 21, 2015); selection of each fine.

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order correspond to the frequency, method and financing of the instant crime.