2. Although there are no circumstances to consider the circumstances, such as the confession of the Defendant to commit the instant crime, the fact that the amount of damage was not significant, etc., the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim up to the trial, and the actual recovery of damage was not made, and the balance in sentencing with other similar cases, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive and circumstance of the instant crime, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, such as the circumstances after the commission of the instant crime, cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.