However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. In around 23:40 on October 25, 2017, the injured Defendant was under the influence of alcohol to the injured party D (55 years old) who was a substitute engineer in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C restaurant. Around October 25, 2017, the injured Defendant her drinking alcohol to the injured party D (5 years old), who was a substitute engineer in the vicinity of Yeonsu-gu, and her drinking alcohol, her drinking alcohol to the injured party D (5 years old), and her drinking alcohol to the injured party D, who was a substitute engineer at around 23:45 of the same day, her drinking alcohol to the injured party E (40 years old), who was the victim E (40 years old), who was the substitute engineer at his/her place, and her head, was in need of the treatment for about 14 days between 14 days, and the injury of the injured party E, etc., which requires treatment between 36 days.

2. The Defendant: (a) arrested the police officers dispatched upon receipt of 112 reports due to the foregoing violent incident as a current criminal; (b) moved to the waiting room for the investigation of the criminal duty team of the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Police Station from October 26, 2017, at around 00:25, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties; (c) requested the G from the G of the F District belonging to the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Police Station to unfold the knife the knife and unfold the knife the knife of the knife of the knife of the knife Party G by unfolding the knife the knife of the knife of the knife Party G, and interfere with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the treatment of police officers and the protection of human rights.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement in relation to E, D, and G;

1. Photographs of the victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (only between the crime of injury to victim G and the crime of obstructing the execution of official duties);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing) is as follows.