재물손괴
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
All the costs of the original judgment and the trial shall be borne by the defendant.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) although the Defendant did not damage television managed by the damaged party from the door and the door, the lower court convicted him of the facts charged in this case; (b) the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, it can be recognized that the Defendant destroyed and damaged the above TV panel at the right edge of the said TV by putting up TV managed by the injured party at the time and place of the decision of the court below.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by applying Articles 191 (1), 190 (1), and the main text of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the burden of litigation costs arising from the original judgment and the trial.