However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 26, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act by the Incheon District Court. On May 6, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 as a fine for the same crime from the Seoul Southern District Court. On May 6, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 as a fine for the same crime.

On July 11, 2019, at around 23:53, the Defendant driven a CMW car while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.102% at the 10m section of the road in front of Pyeongtaek-si building.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the Road Traffic Act prohibition regulations at least twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, etc., investigation reports, and investigation reports (verification of the same type of power);

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime, or the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation, community service order, and order to attend a lecture under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, inasmuch as the defendant for the reason of sentencing again commits the instant crime even though he/she was punished for a drunk driving, the nature of the instant crime is not good, but the execution of imprisonment is suspended mainly considering the fact that he/she has no past record of crime exceeding the previous fine, and an incidental disposition is imposed to prevent recidivism;