beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.06.28 2019고단1474

출입국관리법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall apply for a visa or a visa issuance certificate, or mediate such application, to allow an alien to enter the Republic of Korea.

Around October 2016, the Defendant requested that the Defendant issued the Defendant’s passport, tax payment certificate, bank balance certificate, and the visa of the Republic of Korea to the bearer (hereinafter “B”) who wants to enter the Republic of Korea for employment with no intent to invest in the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, on October 2016, the person whose name was omitted requested a letter of invitation, etc. to allow the defendant to visit the Republic of Korea on November 3, 2016 to the F, who is the general team leader of the EXPO as of the day when the event was held in Yongsan-gu, U.S. from November 3 to May 5, 2016, although the defendant had no intention to attend the exhibition held in Korea, etc., the person whose name was omitted requested the F, who is the general team leader of the EXPO at the EXPO, to send a copy of the defendant's passport, etc. to the Republic of Korea. Accordingly, the person received from F documents necessary for applying for

In addition, on October 27, 2016, the Defendant submitted an application for visa issuance stating the false statement that he visits to the Embassy of the Republic of Korea for the purpose of “short-term use” to the Embassy of the Republic of Korea located in the Pakistan, accompanied by documents, such as a letter of invitation received from the person who was absent from his name, and submitted these documents to the public official in charge of visa in charge

Accordingly, the defendant filed a false visa to allow entry of a foreigner in collusion with a person who is not eligible for name, and at the same time interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning visa issuance review by a public official in charge of visa issuance at the Embassy of the Republic of Pakistan stationed in the Republic of Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. An application for visa issuance, invitation letter, and request for visa issuance;

1. Application of immigration Acts and subordinate statutes to individuals;

1. Relevant Articles 137(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, and Articles 94 subparag. 3 and 7-2 of the Immigration Control Act.