A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

The Defendants misrepresented to be an investigator belonging to the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office by making phone calls to those who are not aware of the names of the accomplices in Korea, and made them false statements to the persons who received the phone, and let the victims transfer the money to the account under the name of Defendant B. Defendant B takes charge of withdrawing the money that he received from his own account. Defendant A took charge of the direction and surveillance of Defendant B, and Defendant A conspired in sequence with accomplices who did not know the name of committing so-called " Bosishing."

1. On August 6, 2015, the Defendants: (a) posted a telephone call to the victim D at an unspecified place on August 6, 2015 by the accomplices whose name is unknown; and (b) arrested the criminal who arrested the account opened in the name of the victim for committing the crime of fraud.

statement is made.

When transferring money deposited in the victim's account to B with the account of the victim, the money will be refunded after checking the details of the transaction with the offender.

“Along with the purpose of false statement, I would like to receive KRW 9,750,00 from the injured party’s account (E) to the one bank account under the name of Defendant B, and Defendant B would withdraw KRW 9,700,000 from the branch office of Han Bank Inter-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, at around 12:57, at around 12:57, under the direction and supervision of Defendant A, and would also call to the accomplice whose name could not be known.

Accordingly, the Defendants, in collusion with those who are not aware of the name as above, received 9,750,000 won from the injured party and acquired it by transfer.

2. The Defendants’ fraud against the victim F was made by calls from the victim F at around 14:10 on the same day to the accomplices whose name cannot be known, and “the account opened by stealing the victim’s name was used for the crime of fraud.”

It is necessary to confirm whether the victim is an accomplice or a victim, and it is the account of the victim.