beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.05.26 2016재고단2 (1)

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The 500 foot (No. 1) No. 32 f. f. 36 f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant has been subject to juvenile protective disposition three times due to special larceny or larceny, and on March 26, 2001, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year by imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny at the Incheon District Court on March 26, 2001, and the judgment became final and conclusive around that time, and habitually;

1. On March 19, 2002, around 00:30, at the same time, a private taxi owned by the injured party is found in the name that was parked in the alley path adjacent to a desired apartment of 2 Dong-gu, Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, and a private taxi was opened a driver's seat after cancelling the locking device of the above paragraph by breaking the stringer of the said taxi and inserting it into a glass door with the driver's seat and inserting it down.

The sum of KRW 19,600 in total, including thirty-two diversity diversity and thirty-six diversity diversity diversity diversity

(1) steals total sum of KRW 21,200 on three occasions, such as (1) a crime inundation, such as theft;

2. At around 01:30 on the same day, the victim C, who was parked at the back of the Hanjin apartment parking lot located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, 1:30, 900, was trying to steal money and valuables after the locking the locking device was cancelled by putting the yellow string string string at the front door of the driver's seat of the victim C-owned D 1 ton truck, which was parked at the front door of the driver's seat of the victim C-owned. However, even though the above cargo did not have the purport of paying money and attempted to steals money and valuables for a total of three times, such as the bill of daily crimes (2) in the attached Form, but did not bring about the intent, and did not bring about each attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written opinion;

1. Court rulings (No. 2002 High Court Order 2061);

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry of criminal history;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crime has been committed in a planned manner;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 332, 329, and 342 of the Criminal Act (generally, the choice of imprisonment with labor);

1. Return;