When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 15:40 on March 24, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 15:40, the victims set temporarily set up the roads in front of Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and (b) 1:20,000 won at the market price of the victim C; (c) 1:00,000 won at the market price of the victim C; (d) 20,000 won at the market price; (e) 4:0,000 won at the market price; (e) 1:20,000 won at the market price of the victim D; (e) 1:5,00 won at the market price of the victim E-owned; and (e) 1:0,000 won at the market price of the 8,000,000 won at the market price; and (e) 1:70,000 won at the market price of the vehicle in front of the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Each written statement prepared in C, D, and E;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. The sentencing guidelines do not apply to the selection of the reasons for sentencing in Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of the workhouse.

Considering the fact that there has been a history of punishment several times in the previous section of the Dong and the fact that damaged goods have been returned, etc.