However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On April 5, 2015, the Defendants: (a) around the street in front of the “D Child Care Center” located in the Gu, Si, Si, Gu; (b) Defendant A driven EchixG car; and (c) Defendant B was under control on the ground that Defendant A operated the said car while under the influence of alcohol content 0.133% under the influence of alcohol by Defendant A to the slope G, Inspector H, etc. affiliated with the Gu, U.S. police station F, which is under the influence of alcohol.

Defendants are dissatisfied with the Defendants, and Defendant A her talked with the police officers. Defendant A her talked with the Defendant, “I am fested several times in the night. I am fested with the region. I am fested. I am fested with the age. I am fested with the shop house. I am fested with the mind. I am fest with the mind. I am. I am am. I am am. I am am.? I am am. I am am. I am.? I am am. I am am. I am back with the face of the above G, you am am ambbow with the left ambow, and ambened with the right kh with the knish, and ambling with the Defendant B’s ambomer’s sleh, and then I am. I am. I am. am...... I am...........

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the crackdown on drinking driving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements (the second court date)

1. Each statement made to G and H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports and reports on the status of the main offender;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants: Imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The Defendants on probation: The criminal records of Defendant A, the circumstances leading up to the crimes by Defendant B, and the police officers who attempted to commit the crimes, and the police officers to commit the crimes under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act.