If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On September 15:00 on September 10, 2018, the Defendant, at the 15:00 department stores B department stores in Seoul, Nowon-gu, Seoul, demanded sampling to employees at the 1st floor cosmetics, and subsequently, the victim C, who is a security worker of the department store, said department store, told the Defendant, revealing his door from the door to the outside of the department store, and carried out the victim’s bath, such as “humd, humping, and huming,” and thump for about six minutes.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the security of the victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant who committed the crime of this case again while the period of probation is being suspended.

However, it shows the appearance that the defendant leads to the confession of the crime and reflects the mistake.

The defendant did not directly use violence and did not cause damage.

In agreement with the victim, the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant.

In full view of the conditions of sentencing as shown in the trial process of this case, such as the character, conduct, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment as indicated in the Disposition shall be determined.