When the defendant does not pay the borrowed money, 100.

The Defendant, from around 02:20 on March 12, 2019 to 02:50 on the same day, at the convenience store located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, the Defendant: (a) placed a big interest in “C”, stating that he was refused to take CCTV immediately to find goods to the victim D; (b) placed a cooling door door at the drinking place three times for the reason that he was refused to take the CCTV; (c) placed three times the glass door at the display place; and (d) continued to return to the convenience store; and (e) prevented customers who were going to enter the convenience store by avoiding disturbance.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the convenience store business of the victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (to attach CCTV images);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;